I apologize for cross-posting. I've also placed this on my campaign Facebook page.
My new comments on my old ('24) statement are in [brackets] and 𝙗𝙤𝙡𝙙.
I think that the current board has ceded its authority to the superintendent with the resolution of September 26. I find that document to be a combination of the outrageous and the ridiculous. Any time that simple human courtesy and politeness must be mandated, there is simply no respect on the part of either party for the other. [𝙄 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙥𝙝. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙪𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙢 𝙩𝙤 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙤𝙬.]
I have the experience necessary for efficient and effective board meetings. I served on the board from 2000-2006 and was the president of the board in 2005. I am certified by the Arkansas School Boards Association as a Master Board Member, exceeding the required training by some 50-odd hours of training. I know the district's history and culture. [𝙄 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙮 𝙛𝙚𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙠 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙚𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚.]
I am, and have been, a staunch supporter of the Little Rock Education Association. I opposed the “end around” that was used by the Walton education group to experiment with performance pay in the district in the early 00s. I was one of the two votes against the program. At the time, I didn’t think of their efforts as union-busting, but an effort by an archly conservative group attempting to woo the largest district in the state into joining their business-forward approach to education. My wife was one of the “Little Rock 69” and I vigorously supported her in what was a very nerve-wracking few days. [𝙎𝙞𝙜𝙝. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙪𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙛𝙞𝙭 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙙𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣.]
I ardently oppose the LEARNS Act and the Ballinger Act. I will urge the board to pursue legal remedies to these efforts to destroy public schools. There are state and US constitutional questions that need to be addressed. On the issue of public employers not being allowed to negotiate with a union, I hope that the LREA might join the district in pursuit of the rights of the board and the union to free speech and free association. [𝙇𝙍𝙎𝘿 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙫𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙤𝙫𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙬𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙟𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙚𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙨𝙪𝙞𝙩 𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙫𝙤𝙪𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙇𝙀𝘼𝙍𝙉𝙎 𝘼𝙘𝙩.]
I understand that learning requires a safe environment, for both students and teachers. But, we can’t make changes or know what to change without some light being shined on the situation. I will call for a monthly report of security calls, police calls, and arrests in our schools. I will also ask for a monthly report detailing theft and vandalism of district property. Once those reports begin to come in, it will most probably become clear where we need to put safety and security efforts. [𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙥𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙖 𝙨𝙮𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙢 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙡 "𝘼𝙗𝙧𝙚" 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙩 𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙥𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙪𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙫𝙞𝙨𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙨. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙣𝙪𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 (𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙚𝙩 𝙘𝙚𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙢𝙮 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙥𝙨. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙨 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙝𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙄 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠.]
A clean environment, while not essential, is preferred by all of us. I know that for some schools this is not a problem, but for others, it is. This is just an example of the district’s long-time situation: some school get a lot, and some school get a little. [𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙗𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙮 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙗𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙨 𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙩 (𝙖𝙣𝙙, 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮, 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙥𝙪𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙘-𝙛𝙖𝙘𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙚) 𝙛𝙖𝙘𝙚𝙨. 𝘼𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣, 𝙄 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙 '𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚.']
Directly related to the above paragraph, I think we have to re-think our curriculum, as much as the state will allow. Former board member Dr. Jim Ross has said on several occasions that the LRSD has failed African-American students for 70 years. I whole-heartedly agree. I think that it goes a bit further than failure: the LRSD has betrayed African-American students through repeatedly buying ed programs that not only cost money, but don’t work. The salesmen of these programs tout their records of success. I am of the opinion that those programs did work at the right school, with the right teachers, and with the right students under the right circumstances. I know that there is no cure-all. But I will strongly support curriculum reform aimed at making ALL students college-ready at graduation. I know that many graduates will not attend college, but making them ready for college will not hurt them as they pursue employment and careers. If you have questions about how this can be accomplished, I recommend that you look at Bob Moses’s Algebra Project and similar initiatives. [𝙃𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙡𝙜𝙚𝙗𝙧𝙖 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙣 𝙢𝙮 𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙤-𝙙𝙤 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩.]
𝙈𝙮 𝙣𝙚𝙬 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙢𝙮 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 '24. He is no doubt, an honest man who wants to make the district better for all. However, he immediately cedes the education side of the board’s oversight to the administration. That is a mistake. The administration needs strong leadership from the board on all facets of oversight. I am not suggesting that the board meddle in teachers’ business. I am saying that something different has to happen because we are continuing our betrayal. [𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙚𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙣-𝙜𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙚𝙛𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙚 𝙘𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙖𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙫𝙚𝙨 (𝙖𝙨 𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙫𝙚) 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙥𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙪𝙢 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙮, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙮-𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜.]
Most of you have golden memories of your own public education. But that era, real or rose-tinted, is not where we are. I dare say that most of the LRSD’s graduates of the last 40 years do not have those sorts of warm fuzzies that many of us have about school. I am not suggesting that we try to create situations that will lead to lovely nostalgia. I’m suggesting that we create an LRSD where the graduates look back and know that they were given their rights and were exposed to the best work that the board, admin, and teachers could do. I want LRSD to create an environment that gives all students the tools they need to students achieve their highest aspirations. [𝙄 𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙣 𝙙𝙚𝙫𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙥𝙝.]
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙮 𝙣𝙤 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨. 𝙃𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙚𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮, 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙣, 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚 $15,000 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙠. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨, 𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙩 4 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖 𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙥𝙡𝙪𝙨 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙙. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙪𝙡𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙡𝙮 𝙤𝙗𝙩𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙢𝙪𝙘𝙝 𝙩𝙤𝙞𝙡. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙤𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙠𝙞𝙙𝙨. 𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙙, 𝙨𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙡𝙮. 𝙁𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙮 𝙚𝙭𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙀𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝘾𝙡𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙙𝙙𝙡𝙚, 𝙖 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙣 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙛𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙩 𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙤𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙜𝙤𝙤𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙮 𝙀𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙀𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙒𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙩𝙤𝙣 𝙀𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙮. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙖 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖 𝙣𝙤𝙣-𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙚𝙣𝙫𝙞𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙩 𝙃𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙃𝙞𝙜𝙝, 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙖 𝙙𝙞𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡, 𝙬𝙚 𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙚. 𝘽𝙪𝙩, 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙚, 𝙬𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙃𝙖𝙡𝙡, 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙞𝙭 𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙝𝙨 𝙖𝙜𝙤, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙤𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣.
𝙄𝙩 𝙢𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄'𝙫𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙛𝙛 𝙤𝙣 𝙨𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙢𝙮 𝙜𝙤𝙖𝙡𝙨, 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 "𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚." 𝙄 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙙 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙖 5-𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢 𝙞𝙣 𝙉𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 '24. 𝙃𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚, 𝙞𝙣 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙪𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙤𝙘𝙖𝙡 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙤𝙪𝙧 9-𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 5-𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙨 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙪𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙨 𝙖 7-𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 4-𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙨. 𝙎𝙤, 𝙄'𝙫𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙜𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙.
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙨 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 3, 2026, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙨.
𝙄 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙁𝙖𝙘𝙚𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙠 𝙥𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙨. 𝙄 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙢𝙮 𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙞𝙜𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙩 (𝙖𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙠). 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩, 𝙄 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙫𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙫𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙕𝙤𝙣𝙚 4.
𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙠 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣.
